14
Tennis
5
Predictions game
Forum
2 Commentaires
Partager
Suivez-nous

Zverev refuses to be controversial: "They're human, it's normal".

Le 10/06/2024 à 12h14 par Elio Valotto
Zverev refuses to be controversial: They're human, it's normal.

Alexander Zverev's reaction was eagerly awaited. Beaten by Alcaraz in Sunday's French Open final (6-3, 2-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2), the German was the victim of a major refereeing error.

In the 5th set of this final, a refereeing error had a clear impact on the outcome of the match. At 2-1 in his favor, Alcaraz saved two break points to keep his serve and take control of the match. Only problem: he had double-faulted at 15-40! Serving a 2nd fault ball, the match referees ruled that the ball was good and Carlos Alcaraz finally won the game. Problem was, they were wrong: the hawk-eye showed it (visible to the media, but not used on clay).


When asked about this fact of play, which could have completely changed the outcome of the match since Zverev should have pulled level at 2-2, the German champion showed his wisdom and tolerance. He explained: "Of course, if you're down 3-1 in the fifth set or if you're at two-all, it makes a big difference. Yes, it's very frustrating, but that's the way it is. There's nothing you can do about it. Referees make mistakes, they're human, it's normal, you have to accept it. In a situation like this, you'd prefer there were no mistakes, but there are."

GER Zverev, Alexander  [4]
3
6
7
1
2
ESP Alcaraz, Carlos  [3]
tick
6
2
5
6
6
Comments
sync
send Send
warning Règles à respecter
Avatar
bogbot.tc
2
As hawkeye is not used at the FO it can't really be said that it was a double fault. All systems have a margin of error. Yes hawkeye has a very small margin- something like 3mm and the line judge/umpire/clay mark inspection method must have a higher margin of error. However it was ruled in using the accepted method and so that's that really. Has to be accepted that something that is close can be called in or out on the day and trying to overlay another method is superfluous to the point, beyond arguing for a switch to hawkeye next year.



There was more to the match than one point.
Daniel N.
star star
0
"Visible to the media" but not to the TV viewers, they only show the hawkeye when it doesn't contradict the referee. With that said, anyone who saw the match knows that Carlos would have won anyway. Zverev played awesome but run out of gas while Carlos hade plenty in the tank.
À lire aussi
Nike's colorful outfits for the Australian Open
Nike's colorful outfits for the Australian Open
Jules Hypolite 03/01/2025 à 18h44
With less than ten days to go before the start of the first Grand Slam of the season, equipment manufacturer Nike has revealed the outfits the players will be wearing in Melbourne. And as has often b...
The programme of exhibition matches to be played by Sinner and Alcaraz before the Australian Open
The programme of exhibition matches to be played by Sinner and Alcaraz before the Australian Open
Jules Hypolite 03/01/2025 à 16h23
Next week, the stars of the ATP and WTA Tours will be in Melbourne to prepare for the first Grand Slam of the season. And in order to have a few moments of relaxation after training, several players,...
Alcaraz's changes to counter his rivals
Alcaraz's changes to counter his rivals
Jules Hypolite 02/01/2025 à 19h38
Carlos Alcaraz will start 2025 with the ambition of winning the Australian Open and completing his first career Grand Slam at just 21 years of age. But in the face of competition from defending champ...
Australian Open: a last-minute change in the men's seeds
Australian Open: a last-minute change in the men's seeds
Jules Hypolite 02/01/2025 à 18h34
With less than two weeks to go before the start of the Australian Open, the order of the top eight men's seeds underwent a slight change on Thursday. Andrey Rublev, who was beaten on his debut in Hon...