Tennis
Predictions game
Forum
arrow_drop_up
Less matches
More matches
arrow_drop_up
8716 views

Thu 14 April 2016
Share
Comments
sync
send Send
warning Règles à respecter
Avatar
davidcarr474188
0
You should check the other thread lol Crash
Tennis007
1
Lol you anti Novak people
davidcarr474188
0
That's an image I would rather not think of
christinenelles88
0
christinenelles88  Tennis , minions and ice cream
He beats himself too.
davidcarr474188
0
Very beatable lol nice one haha Exactly..
vishruth.sgs
1
vishruth.sgs  just talking tennis
That had happened many times over the years. It took serena one loss from vinci and all of a sudden players have new belief when they play her. Confidence is magical!!
christinenelles88
6
christinenelles88  Tennis , minions and ice cream
This should be a message to other players. Djokovic is very beatable.
vishruth.sgs
1
vishruth.sgs  just talking tennis
Same problem so many had against roger and rafa as well. One loss like this does wonders for the confidence of other challengers though so impossible to predict
goochy009
5
goochy009  Tennis , minions and ice cream
See this is why Novak wins all the bloody time. Nobody believes they can beat him they've lost the match before it starts
vishruth.sgs
2
vishruth.sgs  just talking tennis
I still don't understand his "disadvantage" argument. His schedule has been the same for quite a while now
Justtennis
1
Justtennis @Tennislove  Roger the great
Great job...keep it up
davidcarr474188
1
Yep guess I would have guessed few players could have but not him. Good job though even if Novak wasn't playing his best. Have to remember he's at a Disadvantage LOL
dawsonwilson3
6
dawsonwilson3  Victoria Azarenka, The Lioness
I was stunned beyond words. Didn't think Vesely out of all the players could actually take Djokovic out early. Good job, bub, and good luck against Gael!
davidcarr474188
2
Yep good job mate, that's good win to have on paper whether you play at that level again or not :-)
Kelly_15
2
Kelly_15  just talking tennis
Neither did I. Good job, though.