Tennis
1
Predictions game
Community
2 Comments
Share
Follow us

Zverev refuses to be controversial: "They're human, it's normal".

Zverev refuses to be controversial: They're human, it's normal.
© AFP
Elio Valotto
le 10/06/2024 à 11h14
1 min to read

Alexander Zverev's reaction was eagerly awaited. Beaten by Alcaraz in Sunday's French Open final (6-3, 2-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2), the German was the victim of a major refereeing error.

In the 5th set of this final, a refereeing error had a clear impact on the outcome of the match. At 2-1 in his favor, Alcaraz saved two break points to keep his serve and take control of the match. Only problem: he had double-faulted at 15-40! Serving a 2nd fault ball, the match referees ruled that the ball was good and Carlos Alcaraz finally won the game. Problem was, they were wrong: the hawk-eye showed it (visible to the media, but not used on clay).

When asked about this fact of play, which could have completely changed the outcome of the match since Zverev should have pulled level at 2-2, the German champion showed his wisdom and tolerance. He explained: "Of course, if you're down 3-1 in the fifth set or if you're at two-all, it makes a big difference. Yes, it's very frustrating, but that's the way it is. There's nothing you can do about it. Referees make mistakes, they're human, it's normal, you have to accept it. In a situation like this, you'd prefer there were no mistakes, but there are."

Dernière modification le 10/06/2024 à 15h18
Alexander Zverev
3e, 5160 points
Carlos Alcaraz
1e, 12050 points
Zverev A • 4
Alcaraz C • 3
3
6
7
1
2
6
2
5
6
6
French Open
FRA French Open
Draw
Comments
Send
Règles à respecter
Avatar
bogbot.tc
As hawkeye is not used at the FO it can't really be said that it was a double fault. All systems have a margin of error. Yes hawkeye has a very small margin- something like 3mm and the line judge/umpire/clay mark inspection method must have a higher margin of error. However it was ruled in using the accepted method and so that's that really. Has to be accepted that something that is close can be called in or out on the day and trying to overlay another method is superfluous to the point, beyond arguing for a switch to hawkeye next year.

There was more to the match than one point.
2
Daniel N.
"Visible to the media" but not to the TV viewers, they only show the hawkeye when it doesn't contradict the referee. With that said, anyone who saw the match knows that Carlos would have won anyway. Zverev played awesome but run out of gas while Carlos hade plenty in the tank.
Community
1j

As we move to the end of this month and also closing out the year I am wishing all of those following me a Merry Christmas and a Happy/Healthy New Year.

Let's make that wish for all 2000 plus players hoping for 5 wins each day. Hoping ŵhen we open the results page to see all green, and no red. And especially NO CANCELED matches.

From me and my rotti JAZ, I bid you all good night, and see you in...

Read all
3j

I love tennis

11j

why did tennis tonic void predictions on the match between Chwalinska and Huergo at the Quito tournament? The match was played to completion and on time. If TT feels the match is one sided, and of course it was, then don't put it up for prediction. This is getting irritating.

12j

The finals are here, and we scramble for the best finish. I've been chasing "King" all year and I was able to shrink the spread a little. Skelp is also closing the gap.

Seasons best to all the regulars in our league.

Will you all be back in the new year.?

13j

Steffi Graf completed a Golden Slam (not just a career Grand Slam) when she was 19. She is the only person to accomplish that, winning the four majors plus Olympic gold the same calendar year.