Good god man! why so defensive? you've written an entire novel!
while you obviously put ALOT of time and thought into this response, I got bored and quit reading when you turned into Miriam Webster & started rewriting the dictionary in your own words words lol
Please see the newspapers everyday 462 shadow, u can also describe that Federer was imperious against Johnson or any player. I'm telling you how to use it. If u still r uncertain u can check the newspapers,dictionary whatever.
For your kind information, Fed is not a novice or apprentice to the big servers. He has outclassed them on several occasions. You can retrospect by looking the recent matches Fed has played. If u r saying that kyrgios beating Fed is a monumental effort and can easily dispatch Fed, u need to take the current form of Fed also into consideration and which u didn't. So your statement is an absurd one since u completely negated Federer's chances of winning against kyrgios since the latter has won again at Djokovic. And to brief about the word "imperious" it is
a word which is normally used when a player thrashes another. Imperious is also called as having a swagger and being adventurous. This is not at all a derogatory remark. It is a statement which is also used for heralding or praising Fed's performance.
You can pump fed up all you want now that that he doesn't have to face nick lol but we all saw what he did to novak. not once, but twice. nick literally took the racket out of his hands! do you really think fed would have been any different? i think not lol i don't care who you are, it's impossible to beat someone playing at that level.
btw, the word imperious means "arrogant and domineering" so your choice of words is more of an insult to fed than a compliment lol just saying...
It's really not going to be comprehensive for kyrgios even if he was fully fit. The last time these 2 met, it was a tantalizingly close affair. So 462shadow, your statements of kyrgios winning in a facile way considering imperious form of Fed is bollocks. He would have got a fair chance of beating kyrgios too.
Damn it nick! what awful luck! and gifting fed the match! regardless of what fed fans say, i have no doubt it would have been another comprehensive beat down w/nick emerging victorious. oh well... :( ...another title for fed, how boring... now that's lame lol
So to me it seems highly probable that we get a Swiss final. Can't really see Federer loosing to either Nishi or Sock. Neither is it likely that Stan looses to Busta. Federer has a very good chance of clinching the title as it unfolded.
U don't want Justin..... Many ppl want to see him winning.... Anyways ur andy ll win another 100 slams.... So relax.... Atleast let fed win this masters.... Ur andy won't let anyone to win slams for another 25 years....
Jannik Sinner made the launch of his YouTube vlog channel official yesterday, having published a first video in which he retraces his second Australian Open title with exclusive footage.
Nick Kyrgios...
Nick Kyrgios' start to the 2025 season has not gone according to plan.
The Australian, who returned to Brisbane after an absence of almost two seasons due to various injuries, lost to Giovanni Mpetsh...
Beaten in the 1st round in Brisbane and at the Australian Open, Nick Kyrgios has missed his return to competition after almost two years without playing.
With an abdominal injury sustained in Melbour...
17-year-old Swiss player Henry Bernet won last week's Junior Australian Open after a solid tournament in which he dropped just one set.
Heralded as the new Roger Federer with his one-handed backhand,...
Good god man! why so defensive? you've written an entire novel!
while you obviously put ALOT of time and thought into this response, I got bored and quit reading when you turned into Miriam Webster & started rewriting the dictionary in your own words words lol
a word which is normally used when a player thrashes another. Imperious is also called as having a swagger and being adventurous. This is not at all a derogatory remark. It is a statement which is also used for heralding or praising Fed's performance.
btw, the word imperious means "arrogant and domineering" so your choice of words is more of an insult to fed than a compliment lol just saying...
i was happy for fed when he won AO in Jan, but it's March now & I'm already sick of him lol
wtf?! seriously?
lmao :D
Keep moaning