StatistiquesReduce
Winner shots
Unforced errors
Aces
Double faults
1st serve %
% first serve points won
Break point saved
Return points won %
Break points won
Points won %
Love games
Set points
Match points
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
StatistiquesExpand
Break points won
Points won %
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Serve
Return
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Serve
Return
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Serve
Return
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Serve
Return
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Serve
Return
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Serve
Return
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
All
Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Set 5
Nobody take the stats from exhibitions in count on the tour, literally nobody
Only delusional people thinks that players consider this something else than an exib, just take a look at the different exib (any format), competitions, and then compare the players, look at their faces, the atmosphere, the fact that they are coachless, they prepare like they will NEVER do it for a competition, the coverage, the medias, the time between matches, and let's be honest, the fact that they prepared x times for the event, the points they will get from it and what it means for their season, for them, and their staff (inexistant during Laver cup).
Honestly I like the idea of exhibitions, and the fact that we experience something else with our sport, but laver cup is a bs exib, and the level of competition is a joke on so many levels.
Stupid logic
English isn't my first language but I know how to read and understand you point, and it is wrong.
Tennis on the tour is all about environment, not about having a "competition bone", but about your preparation, your staff and your mental state, it is all that matters. It is not you as a player, but a whole.
I talked about coaches as a part of the environment of a player during a competition, do you know that most players on the tour arent capable to perform without their coach, it is a thing even if that's doesn't suit your logic.
You are the only one talking about "being serious", I talk about being on a competition, laver cup isn't a competition it is simple as that, you said "in their minds it was still competitive" as if it was spontaneous, but it isn't, parameters aren't here to make it competitive.
When you talk about sets, if you think result means something take a look at what means "result oriented".
If competing on the tour (future, itf and chall included, I mean professional circuit overall not only WTA/ATP) was about "playing not to lose" then everyone could be a top players, and any match would be a competition, I will make a ace88exhibition, you can choose the players I will make some contracts ready for the people over here 😂😂😂
An exhibition is meaningless for most players ESPECIALLY TOP PLAYERS, end of the debate, you need to build history to make it something prestigious, if not it is an exhibition.
Grigor get some points but honestly, Daniil seems way ahead tennis-wise
I wonder if he got a chance to make something during a TB against Daniil.